Type to search


New York Times stands by report of Trump-Russia connections despite FBI memo debunking it

Chuck Ross on July 18, 2020

The New York Times is standing by a February 2017 report alleging that Trump associates were in communication with Russian intelligence officers, even after the release of an internal FBI memo that identified numerous inaccuracies in the story.

“We stand by our reporting,” New York Times spokeswoman Eileen Murphy told her own paper for its report on the newly released documents.

Attorney General William Barr declassified two documents this week related to the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign. One released Friday is a 57-page memo of interviews that dossier author Christopher Steele’s primary source conducted with the FBI in January 2017.

The second is former FBI official Peter Strzok’s annotation of a Feb. 14, 2017, report that said four American officials claimed that authorities had intercepted communications and call logs of Trump advisers speaking with Russian intelligence.

“This statement is inaccurate and misleading as written,” Strzok wrote in reference to opening paragraph of the Times story. “We have not seen evidence of any individuals affiliated with the Trump team in contact with [Intelligence Officers].”

Strzok, who was the FBI’s lead investigator on Crossfire Hurricane, the name for the Trump-Russia probe, poured cold water on other aspects of the Times report, including that investigators were sifting through a vast trove of call records and that Trump confidant Roger Stone was under investigation at the time.

The Times story advanced the prevailing narrative at the time that the Trump campaign may have conspired with the Kremlin to influence the 2016 election. The story also hit a day after Michael Flynn resigned as national security adviser because of a scandal involving phone calls he had with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak in December 2016.

Strzok was aware of those calls because the FBI obtained a transcript of them through surveillance of Kislyak.

Investigators ultimately found no evidence of collusion between Trump associates and the Russian government. Special counsel Robert Mueller’s report did not make any reference to communications in 2016 between any Trump associates and Russian intelligence operatives.

Murphy, the Times spokeswoman, did not go into detail about why the paper is sticking by the story in light of the new memo.

The Times has recently come under scrutiny for two other reports regarding Russia.

The paper reported on June 26 that President Donald Trump was briefed in March on intelligence that Russian intelligence operatives were paying Taliban fighters to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan. The White House vehemently denied that Trump was told about the intelligence.

Three days later, The Times reported that the intelligence was included in a written briefing book and that it was unclear whether the information was verbally communicated to Trump.

The Times reported on Feb. 20 that an intelligence community official told Congress that the Russian government was interfering in the ongoing presidential campaign to help Trump. Other news outlets, including CNN, reported that the initial report was garbled, and that the intelligence community official “mischaracterized” the intelligence during her briefing to Congress.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Scroll down to comment!


  1. 1PatriotForever July 19, 2020

    That’s why You never believe THE NYT or MSM or any progressive because even though The TRUTH IS CLEAR they can’t speak the truth, even if their lives depended on it.

  2. Jojodmonkey July 19, 2020

    They have to stand behind their stories if they don’t, the entire democrat propaganda machine will collapse and the management and a majority of all news reporters will go to prison immediately!

  3. Terry Weston July 19, 2020

    From a Demo-commie propaganda rag. What else would you expect ?

  4. situs slot crown August 3, 2020

    It is truly a great and helpful piece of info.

    I am glad that you simply shared this useful info with us. Please keep us up to date like this.
    Thank you for sharing.

  5. I know this site gives quality dependent content and additional material, is there
    any other web site which presents such things
    in quality?

  6. elektrofahrer.ch August 8, 2020

    My partner and I absolutely love your blog and find the majority of your
    post’s to be just what I’m looking for. can you offer
    guest writers to write content available for you? I wouldn’t mind creating a post or elaborating
    on a lot of the subjects you write related to here. Again, awesome web log!

  7. situs judi online slot August 16, 2020

    Today, I went to the beachfront with my kids. I found a sea shell
    and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She placed the shell to her
    ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear.
    She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is entirely
    off topic but I had to tell someone!

  8. yozgat.justgear.net August 16, 2020

    I’ve been browsing on-line greater than three hours nowadays, but I by no means discovered any attention-grabbing article like yours.

    It is lovely worth enough for me. Personally, if all web owners
    and bloggers made excellent content as you
    did, the net will likely be much more useful than ever before.

  9. Maureen September 1, 2020

    The long, dark inexperienced leaves contrast nicely with
    the white stripes and the geometric shape is agreeable to the

  10. Leia September 4, 2020

    It grows up to 30 ft tall and blooms in mid to late winter with pink flowers.

  11. onlyfans hack link September 5, 2020

    This page certainly hhas all the information I needed about this subject and
    didn’t knjow whho to ask.

  12. onlyfans hack list September 7, 2020

    Very nice write-up. I certainly appreciate this site.

    Stuck with it!

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
There are a million ways to get your news.
We want to be your one in a million.
Stay Updated
Give it a try, you can unsubscribe anytime.
Send this to a friend