SCOTUS throws out challenge on Trump’s plan to exclude undocumented immigrants from Census count
On Friday morning, the Supreme Court declined to issue a ruling on a case dealing with whether or not the Trump administration may dictate that illegal immigrants be excluded from the census count for the purposes of congressional representation. The ruling is a narrow victory for Trump as it wipes away a lower court opinion that went against him, but the president still has upcoming hurdles should he try to push through his policy based on census data in his final days in office.
An unsigned opinion from the majority of the court concluded that it would be premature to issue a ruling because it is uncertain how the administration will eventually implement the directive to not count illegal immigrants from a memo President Trump signed in July.
“Consistent with our determination that standing has not been shown and that the case is not ripe, we express no view on the merits of the constitutional and related statutory claims presented. We hold only that they are not suitable for adjudication at this time,” reads the actual, unsigned opinion.
“At present, this case is riddled with contingencies and speculation that impede judicial review,” the unsigned opinion of the court also read.
“The President, to be sure, has made clear his desire to exclude aliens without lawful status from the apportionment base. But the President qualified his directive by providing that the Secretary should gather information ‘to the extent practicable’ and that aliens should be excluded ‘to the extent feasible,” it continued. “Any prediction of how the Executive Branch might eventually implement this general statement of policy is ‘no more than conjecture’ at this time.”
It appears the majority ruled that there is no legally redressable injury at present as the policy has not yet been implemented. The issue split the court along ideological lines.
The dissent on the case was signed by three liberal justices led by Stephen Breyer. He was joined by justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor.
“The plain meaning of the governing statutes, decades of historical practice, and uniform interpretations from all three branches of Government demonstrate that aliens without lawful status cannot be excluded from the decennial census solely on account of that status,” Breyer wrote. “The Government’s effort to remove them from the apportionment base is unlawful, and I believe this Court should say so.”
BREAKING: In 6-3 vote, Supreme Court says effort to block Pres. Trump from excluding undocumented immigrants from a key Census count was "premature." https://t.co/GAt2DpBCQ9
— ABC News (@ABC) December 18, 2020
The census numbers must be delivered to the president by the end of this month. The president must then give those numbers to Congress within one week of when the next session of Congress opens in early January. Then the clerk of the House, within 15 days of that, needs to inform governors of how many House members their individual states will have for the next decade so the states can go ahead with their apportionment.
The majority of SCOTUS stated that it is not clear to what extent the government will even be able to follow Trump’s memorandum.
“Everyone agrees by now that the Government cannot feasibly implement the memorandum by excluding the estimated 10.5 million aliens without lawful status,” the opinion later said. “Yet the only evidence speaking to the predicted change in apportionment unrealistically assumes that the President will exclude the entire undocumented population.”
Supreme Court dismisses case on excluding illegal immigrants from census counthttps://t.co/rHjk0ZB6Iu
— Fox News (@FoxNews) December 18, 2020
The ACLU’s Dale Ho of the Voting Right Project said that his group may head back to court once more clarity exists on what exactly the government will do.
“This Supreme Court decision is only about timing, not the merits,” he said. “This ruling does not authorize President Trump’s goal of excluding undocumented immigrants from the census count used to apportion the House of Representatives. The legal mandate is clear — every single person counts in the census, and every single person is represented in Congress. If this policy is ever actually implemented, we’ll be right back in court challenging it.”
This could wind up back in front of the Supreme Court once the effect of the administration’s policy becomes more concrete. It could also just fall away if the census numbers take long enough that President-elect Joe Biden is sworn in and reverses the policy before they are given to the president, turned over to Congress, and delivered to the states. That seems likely at this point in time.